On Teleological Definitions

Teleological approaches put the goal first and derive the appropriate frameworks, formalisms, and means to achieve the goal.

The ethical paradigms have been defined by the top-level goal that motivates the approach. The framework used can then be generalized and tweaked into different theories within the paradigm. I believe it’s important to note the teleological inspirations, which are often implicitly assumed when working with the frameworks. On this wiki, I will prefer formalistic definitions as they seem more general and capable of accommodating changes in goal formulations.

A goal of consequentialist utilitarianism is “the greatest good for the greatest number”¹Which is debated, with Bentham advocating “the less difference between the two unequal parts”.
- Generally, “the best possible consequences”, can be an overarching goal.
A goal of virtue ethics is eudaimonia: to live a good life of “good spirit”, the pursuit of which leads to developing virtues.
A goal of Kantian deontology is to attain the Kingdom of Ends composed of rational beings who live by common, universal laws².
The goal of attaining social coordination for the benefit of all involved can fuel multiple paradigms.

SUMO

Formally, a top-level moral goal can be defined within the respective framework.